No Indian Troops to Serve the US War in
Iraq
Between September 1915 and April 1916, thousands of Indian
soldiers had died in the then Mesopotamia fighting Britain’s
war against Turkey. They were among the 90,000 Indian troops
killed during the First World War in whose memory stands the
colossal and colonial India Gate at the heart of New Delhi.
The British cemeteries of the British Indian Army victims
of World War I along the banks of the Tigris in Iraq are however
seen by the Iraqis as nothing better than unwanted memories
of foreign occupation. Last month, American soldiers reportedly
restored one such cemetery at Al Kut, a town between Basra
and Baghdad in eastern Iraq. It was soon desecrated again
by Iraqis angry over the unfurling of the British flag over
it.
The US wants the Indian Army to relive the experience of the
British Indian Army in Iraq. Yes, if Indian troops are sent
to Iraq they will be joining their predecessors who fought
Britain’s wars against Germany, Japan and their allies
during the two World Wars. Indian troops in occupied Iraq
will be a fundamentally different proposition from the 37
UN missions in which Indian forces have participated over
the last fifty-odd years of Indian independence since 1947.
The very expression ‘stabilisation force’ is different
from the standard terminology of peacekeeping missions or
reconstruction efforts. Indian troops are supposed to assist
the Anglo-American forces in combating Iraqi instability.
Right now American troops in occupied Iraq are engaged in
major military assaults, after Operation Peninsula Strike
they have now launched a new operation codenamed Desert Scorpion.
While hundreds of Iraqis have been killed since Bush declared
on May 1 that major combat was over in Iraq, the Americans
are also losing at least one soldier every day. Indian troops
are being asked to walk straight into this morass. No amount
of UN ‘cover’ or autonomy of the Indian forces
will alter the fundamental character of the role of the Indian
troops in occupied Iraq.
The NDA government says there is no American pressure on India
on sending troops to Iraq. Call it American persuasion or
Indian passion, the fact is this one single question dominated
all of Advani’s recent meetings with US leaders. Advani
himself has distinguished his second visit from the first
on the basis that the former was seen to be rather Pakistan-centric.
Bush has already sent a Pentagon team to India to clarify
Indian doubts while Vajpayee has launched a campaign to manufacture
a ‘national consensus’ with his meeting with Sonia
Gandhi.
Following the Vajpayee-Sonia meeting, Yashwant Sinha has said
that the final decision would be taken in the best national
interest. Who and what will define this best interest of the
nation? The comprador greed for a share in Iraqi spoils or
the Indian ruling elite’s delusion of grandeur which
believes that the service and sacrifice rendered by the Indian
troops in Iraq would cement New Delhi’s strategic ties
with Washington and give India an entry into the big league
of global players? The democratic and progressive Indian opinion
rejects this basis with the contempt it deserves. The principles
of democracy and anti-imperialism which can unite the needs
and aspirations of the Indian people with those of the Iraqi
people as well as the freedom- and justice-loving people of
the whole world can be the only acceptable basis for determining
India’s best interests.
We have been told that no decision on sending troops would
be taken till there is a national consensus. But on the question
of Iraq, there already exists a national consensus expressed
in the form of the parliamentary resolution of April 8 which
categorically condemned the illegal and unjust war imposed
by the Anglo-American alliance and called for an early withdrawal
of all foreign troops from the soil of Iraq. How can the Government
of India now take a step in violation of this resolution,
a step that will legitimise American occupation and add more
foreign troops?
By entertaining the idea of sending Indian troops to Iraq,
the BJP and the Congress have already violated and challenged
the existing national consensus. Well, there can always be
a US-inspired BJP-Congress deal on the subject, but there
can never be a national consensus. Let the real nation stand
up and defeat the ruling classes’ attempts to manufacture
and market a fraudulent national consensus. No
Indian troops to Iraq! No US bases in India!
BPKMS Enters Into second Phase of its Membership
Campaign
The task of strengthening the organisation of agricultural
labourers and other rural poor and intensifying the struggle
against deepening agrarian crisis is being taken up by the
Bihar unit of the Party as a four point campaign with proper
emphasis given to expand agriculture labour organisation (BPKMS)
by recruiting new members and strengthening intervention in
the panchayati raj institutions.
The first phase of this campaign saw a large scale recruitment
and achieved its target of inducting more than 3 lakhs members.
A massive membership campaign was launched in almost all districts.
Bhojpur witnessed highest membership with nearly 70,000 members
and is likely to achieve its target of 1 lakh during the next
phase while reports from Rohtas (45,000), Aurangabad (20,000),
Patna Rural (50,000), Nalanda (32,000) and Muzaffarpur (15,000)
are also encouraging. All the district committees have taken
up this campaign with full commitment and in very few districts
where a slow pace was observed initially, committees resolved
to overcome ideological-political weaknesses in this regard
and called for all leaders and cadres to take up the task
by going to villages to lead the campaign personally. This
gave a new impetus to the campaign and helped activists to
unleash their full vigour and strength.
Now in the second phase, emphasis is being given to further
broaden and expand the base among various sections of agricultural
labourers in new areas and villages.
This campaign also witnessed militant mass resistances when
two of CPI(ML) activists working on agricultural labourers’
front were killed by feudal forces in West Champaran and Bhojpur
districts. Protest and Pledge-taking meetings were held at
both the places where a large number of agricultural workers
and rural poor participated.
|
|
OBITUARY
ML Update pays its deepest
condolences to Comrade Somraj Pandit who was killed
by Ranvir Sena in a cowardly manner on 15 May 2003 in
Dhanahuan village of Bhojpur district. He was campaigning
for BPKMS. He was the block committee member of BPKMS
and a popular leader.
A mass meeting was organised
on June 11 in his native village Amruhi to pay tributes
to Comrade Somraj. It was addressed by Party’s
senior leader Comrade Ram Naresh Ram. Comrade Ram condemned
Ranvir Sena’s fresh attempts to again destabilise
the Sahar region and appealed to the people to give
a befitting reply to Ranvir Sena. People’s desire
to completely wipe out Ranvir Sena was evidently manifested
in the massive and militant participation of the people
in the meeting. Local committee has launched a massive
campaign to punish the Sena leaders and killers of Comrade
Somraj. |
CPI(ML) Team Visits Talhan in Punjab
A team of CPI(ML) and CPI(M) (Pasla) leaders visited Talhan
village in Jalandhar district of Punjab on 14 June where police
opened fired on a dalit demonstration on June 5 resulting
in the death of a youth. Earlier this village witnessed clashes
between dalits and Jats over the demand of representation
of dalits in Gurudwara management committee that hit the headlines
in the national dailies. This incident has triggered tension
in the whole of doaba belt of Punjab and the dalits have come
out into the streets and, consequently, Jalandhar witnessed
violent clashes and long curfews.
Though the local administration denied permission to the team
to meet people or enter the village, all sorts of Congress
leaders as well as the notorious extremists of the Damdami
Taksal were allowed to move in the curfew bound village. Even
the Damdami Taksal chief Mokam Singh was allowed to hold press
conference inside the disputed gurudwara. Congress govt. was
trying to fish in the troubled waters by aligning to the fundamentalist
outfits. The Akali Dal is openly supporting the old management
committee which refused to give proper representation to dalits
exposing its anti-dalit position.
The team strongly felt that the dalits, who constitute more
than 70% of Talhan village, must be given proper representation
in the affairs of the said gurudwara.
The team also demanded to arrest and punish the people who
gave the call for social boycott of dalits in the village
in February. Team criticized the administration for not taking
any action at that time and allowed to worsen the situation
further. The team demanded strong action against officials
who have not arrested the culprits.
The team condemned the Congress govt. for not allowing the
democratic and Left organisations and media to meet people
in Talhan and visit the disputed Gurudwara. The team also
called upon the govt. to immediately call off unnecessarily
imposed indefinite curfew which is causing untold miseries
in this summer season and to involve all political, social
organisations and democratic personalities to normalise the
situation.
Finally, the team called upon the people of Punjab to fight
the dangerous policies of one-up-manship being played by the
Congress and Akali Dal to vitiate the atmosphere of peace
in the state and push the class issues to the background.
The serious agrarian crisis and stagnating economy coupled
with the growing assertion of the oppressed sections is bringing
more and more people in the movement. It was felt that the
conspiracy to divide the people by giving credence to fundamentalist
and reactionary forces can only be defeated by building a
strong united Left assertion.
The team consisted of Swapan Mukherjee, S. Nat and M. P.
S. Khurana from CPI(ML), H. Singh, Chandrasekhar and Baldev
Singh from CPI(M)(Pasla), Editor of ‘Jaikara’
Narvinder and noted journalist and Secretary of Kendriya Lekhari
Sabha Sushil.
Against US Occupation of Iraq:
Meeting in Delhi to Protest Vajpayee Govt.’s
Move to Send Indian Troops to Iraq
A public meeting was held at Constitution Club in New Delhi
on 16 June to oppose and protest the Vajpayee Govt.’s
preparedness to send Indian troops to Iraq. The meeting was
held under the banner of ‘Committee Against War on Iraq’.
Meeting demanded that the Vajpayee govt. must stop acting
as US agent and reject the US demand and pressure for sending
Indian troops to Iraq and expressed apprehension over the
developing deal between the BJP and the Congress on this issue.
A number of leaders representing several political parties
addressed the meeting.
Speaking at the meeting the CPI(ML) General Secretary Dipankar
Bhattacharya said, “pro-American establishment in India
is trying to manufacture a fake national consensus on this
issue. There can always be a US-inspired BJP-Congress deal,
but there can never be a national consensus. There already
exists a national consensus in the form of April 8 Parliament
Resolution which condemned the US aggression and demanded
withdrawal of invading Anglo-American forces from Iraq.”
Comrade Dipankar said, “the talk of UN cover is a smoke-screen
to camouflage the real issue. No amount of UN cover will alter
the fundamental character of the role of the Indian troops
in occupied Iraq. Indian troops will only be used to assist
the Anglo-American forces who are creating havoc in Iraq and
being resisted by the Iraqis.”
The meeting was presided over by CPI(M) Parliamentarian
Somnath Chatterjee. CPI(M) leader Prakash Karat, CPI leader
D. Raja, Forward Bloc leader G. Devrajan, JD(S) leader Kunwar
Danish Ali and RJD leader Raghuvansh Prasad Singh addressed
the meeting. Noted writer and columnist Syed Shahabuddin,
Praful Bidwai and Mani Shankar Aiyar also addressed the meeting.
Mr. Aiyar said that he was attending the meeting in his own
capacity and he was personally opposed to the idea of sending
Indian troops to Iraq. Praful Bidwai said that this should
be seen as a continuation of the anti-war movement. The question
of UN cover must not be allowed to divert and dilute the fundamental
and principled opposition of the Indian people to the war
and its aftermath. He said that if war was unjust, so is the
ongoing occupation even if it has been legitimised by the
U N.
CPI(ML) on Vajpayee’s China Visit
The CPI(ML) has described the forthcoming visit of Prime Minister
Atal Bihari Vajpayee to China as important and called upon
the government to give emphasis to the points of unity among
two nations in order to counter the growing threat of American
hegemony. But simultaneously, Party apprehends that the foreign
policy being pursued by the Vajpayee govt. is the major obstacle
in this direction.
The Party General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya has said
that while strengthening of relations between India and China
will be an important factor in countering the growing US-led
imperialist threat in the Asian region at this juncture, the
government is working in an entirely opposite direction to
appease the US which is being manifested in the advocacy of
a US-Israel-India axis.
War may have killed 10,000 Iraqi civilians
At least 5,000 civilians may have been killed during the invasion
of Iraq, an independent research group has claimed. Iraq Body
Count (IBC), a volunteer group of British and US academics
and researchers compiled statistics on civilian casualties
from media reports and estimated that between 5,000 and 7,000
civilians died in the conflict. Three completed studies suggest
that between 1,700 and 2,356 civilians died in the battle
for Baghdad alone. As more evidence is collated, the report
says, this figure could reach 10,000.
“The totality is now producing an unassailable sense
that there were a hell of a lot of civilian deaths in Iraq”,
said the author of the report, John Sloboda, professor of
psychology at Keele University. He further said, “there
was nothing in principle to stop a total count being made
using forensic science methods similar to those used to calculate
the death toll from the September 11 attack: It was a question
of political will and resources.”
Lieutenant Colonel James Cassella, a US defence department
spokesman, said the Pentagon had not counted civilian deaths
because its efforts had been focused on defeating enemy forces
rather than aiming at civilians. He said that under international
law the US was not liable to pay compensation for “injuries
or damage occurring during ‘lawful’ combat operations”.
The Iraqi authorities estimated that 2,278 civilians had
died in the 1991 Gulf war.
- Courtesy Guardian,UK.
CPI(ML) Boycotts Legislative Council Elections
in Bihar
Bihar State Committee of CPI(ML) has reiterated its earlier
demand to abolish Bihar Legislative Council as it does not
serve any fruitful purpose and decided to boycott the ongoing
elections of MLCs from local bodies quota.
The Party has said that the Legislative Council is a useless
institution and it is in the interest of the people of the
state to abolish it as soon as possible in order to save crores
of rupees being spent on it. This money could have been used
for much needed developmental projects in the state.
Legislative Councils are in existence only in five states
of the country. While in many states it never came into existence
and many like Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and West
Bengal have already abolished it. It only serves as a back-door
entry for the power hungry at the cost of state exchequer.
The legislative Council is an unnecessary body is evident
in the fact that the ongoing process of elections to the Council
from local bodies quota, which is approximately one third
of total seats, is taking place after a gap of nearly 25 years
as there were no local bodies elections in Bihar in that period.
Even though the need to hold these elections was never felt.
B R I E F S
ð Comrade Prabhunath Singh,
CPI(ML) leader in Duddhi, Sonbhadra, sat on a 48 hour hunger
strike on June 4-5 demanding rehabilitation package for the
people displaced by Kanhar Dam project and an immediate solution
to the drinking water problem in villages.
ð The admission assistance
booth by AISA in Delhi University is attracting good number
of students. As yet it has distributed more than 10,000 forms
on first day itself and helping freshers by giving all necessary
assistance.
ð The Shahari Gharib Morcha
(Urban Poor Organisation) in Arrah has launched its membership
drive and campaigning for the issues directly affecting the
poor by daily conducting mass-contact and propaganda in various
localities in a planned way and has covered five localities
so far.
Millions Join One-Day Strike in France
French government workers, joined by private-sector employees,
halted public transport, postal services and other basic services
in a massive one-day strike on June 10. The strike—the
third such one-day labour mobilisation in the past month—was
called to coincide with the opening of debate in the National
Assembly on the government’s bill to slash pension benefits
for millions of workers. The measure would require government
employees to work 40 years before retirement, rather than
the 37.5 years required now, and would be further extended
to 42 years. It amount to a pension cut of 30 percent or more.
Postal workers, rail workers, state bank employees, telecommunications
operators, nurses, teachers, gas and electricity workers,
and employees in justice, defence and customs offices joined
in the nationwide strike. Police officers also participated.
Tuesday’s action was called by all of the main trade
union federations with the exception of the CFDT (French Democratic
Confederation of Labour), which has signed onto the pension
“reform” drafted by the government. The CFDT is
traditionally linked to the right wing of the Socialist Party.
The CGT (General Confederation of Labour), which has long-standing
ties to the Communist Party, and the FO (Workers’ Power),
which has links with the Socialist Party, are opposing the
government measure.
Although the political parties of the “plural left”
parliamentary opposition, led by the Socialist Party and the
Communist Party, have kept their distance from the movement
of strikes and protests and leading figures in the Socialist
Party, including former Prime Minister Michel Rocard, have
openly come out in support of the government bill, the government
workers have broad support in the general population. A poll
published June 7 by Le Figaro reported that 66 percent of
respondents supported or sympathised with the strikers.
While officially supporting the strike movement, the CGT and
FO leadership have been working assiduously to limit it’s
scope and head off a more generalised mobilisation that would
pose a direct political challenge to the Chirac-Raffarin government.
The centre-right coalition has a large majority of deputies
in the National Assembly, and Prime Minister Raffarin has
repeatedly declared that he intends to push the pension bill
through. On June 10, more than 50 cities in France witnessed
demonstrations involving millions of workers. The mood of
the demonstrations was very serious which manifested a grim
determination.
Edited, published and printed by S.
Bhattacharya for CPI(ML) Liberation from U-90, Shakarpur,
Delhi-92; printed at Bol Publication, R-18/2, Ramesh Park,
Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92; Phone:22521067; fax: 22518248, e-mail:
mlupdate@cpiml.org, website: cpiml.org
|